Versionsunterschiede von Informationssammlung Corona / PCR-Test




← Vorherige Änderung
NĂ€chste Änderung →
Version 28 vom 13.02.2022 20:07 ▌
(3,0 KiB) +2.066
WikiAdmin




1 1 https://dlive.tv/CoronaInvestigative
  2  
  3 {{toc}}  
  4  
2 5
3 6 RT-qPCR
4 7   *
  8   * https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/protocol-v2-1.pdf?sfvrsn=a9ef618c_2  
  9   * ((https://www.who.int/ihr/annex_2/en/ annex 2 international health regulation))  
  10   * https://int.artloft.co/professor-drosten-in-the-dilemma-of-the-pcr-test/ ?  
5 11
6 12
7  
8     * ((https://www.who.int/ihr/annex_2/en/ annex 2 international health regulation))
9  
10  
11  
12   **Knew Drosten of fraudulant nature of PCR?**
  13 ====**Knew Drosten of fraudulant nature of PCR?**====
13 14   * Drosten had ties to Gavi
14 15   * Drosten knew PCR Test was not appropriate
15 16   * Drosten + ChariteÂŽ
16 17   * https://www.corodok.de/der-drosten-test/
17 18   * PCR Test nicht fĂŒr Gesunde Menschen entwickelt > Beipackzettel
18     *
  19   * PCR Test weist durch VervielfĂ€ltigung totes Virenmatetrial nach, und nicht nur Sars-Cov2, sondern zeigt auch andere Viren! Wurde nicht auf eine bestimmte Virussequenz hin konzipiert/designed, sondern sollte auch andere Mutationen nachweisen
  20   * Drosten knew:
  21     * PCR Test weist nicht Übertragbarkeit nach,
  22     * weist auch nicht die Krankheit nach, eine Krankheit entsteht meist aus mehreren unterschiedlichen Viren
  23     * keine Standard ct-Werte
  24
  25   * file:screenshot_20220213_190553.png
  26
  27 #||
  28 ||
  29 file:screenshot_20220213_1854541.png
  30 |
  31 file:screenshot_20220213_185535.png
  32 ||
  33 ||
  34 file:screenshot_20220213_185720.png
  35 |
  36 file:screenshot_20220213_190002.png
  37 ||
  38 ||#
19 39 Drosten hatte Test erst fertig, nachdem ein Unternehmen ein komerzielles Produkt veröffentlicht
20 40 weiter: https://newsblog.one/was-olfert-landt-vom-pcr-test-haelt/
  41  
  42  
  43 ====**Was the test designed to produce cases?**====  
  44   * Indiz: schnelle Entwicklungszeit?  
  45   * Indiz: ((https://www.sott.net/article/437207-COVID19-PCR-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with))  
  46  
  47 ====**Did the approvers/regalatory institutions know?**====  
  48   * double checked with different test method if SARS-Cov-2?  
  49   * ? <[// "I just want to identify who sponsored that simulation conference, 6 weeks before the first news broke out of Wuhan,” I interjected. “It was the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security, and the World Economic Forum. Incidentally, all the stats, projections and modeling you see in the media are coming out of Johns Hopkins.”"// https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ ?]>  
  50   * Corman Drosten Test was promoted by authorities over other alternatives  
  51  
  52  
21 53
22 54 ----
23 55
24 56 ChariteÂŽ funding 550 Mio $
25 57 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Summit
  58  
  59 Easier to produce numbers with different regulations for SARS-Cov-2 compared with SARS-Cov-1  
  60     * accredition procedures changed  
  61     * cibd approval > labs are not accountable, leaves black box  
26 62
27 63
28 64 Fauci E-Mails:
31 67   * https://archive.org/details/anthony-fauci-emails/mode/2up
32 68
33 69   * https://youtu.be/bAICMQ1D5F8 Fauci on PCR Test
  70  
  71