Versionsunterschiede von Informationssammlung Corona / PCR-Test
| 1 | 1 | https://dlive.tv/CoronaInvestigative |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | ||
| 3 | {{toc}} | |
| 4 | ||
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | RT-qPCR |
| 4 | 7 | * |
| … | … | … |
| 7 | 10 | * https://int.artloft.co/professor-drosten-in-the-dilemma-of-the-pcr-test/ ? |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 |
|
|
| 13 | ====**Knew Drosten of fraudulant nature of PCR?**==== | |
| 11 | 14 | * Drosten had ties to Gavi |
| 12 | 15 | * Drosten knew PCR Test was not appropriate |
| 13 | 16 | * Drosten + ChariteÂŽ |
| 14 | 17 | * https://www.corodok.de/der-drosten-test/ |
| 15 | 18 | * PCR Test nicht fĂŒr Gesunde Menschen entwickelt > Beipackzettel |
| 16 |
* PCR Test weist durch VervielfÀltigung totes Virenmatetrial nach, und nicht nur Sars-Cov2, sondern zeigt auch andere Viren |
|
| 19 | * PCR Test weist durch VervielfÀltigung totes Virenmatetrial nach, und nicht nur Sars-Cov2, sondern zeigt auch andere Viren! Wurde nicht auf eine bestimmte Virussequenz hin konzipiert/designed, sondern sollte auch andere Mutationen nachweisen | |
| 17 | 20 | * Drosten knew: |
| 18 | 21 | * PCR Test weist nicht Ăbertragbarkeit nach, |
| 19 | 22 | * weist auch nicht die Krankheit nach, eine Krankheit entsteht meist aus mehreren unterschiedlichen Viren |
| 20 | 23 | * keine Standard ct-Werte |
| 24 | ||
| 21 | 25 | * file:screenshot_20220213_190553.png |
| 22 | 26 | |
| 23 | 27 | #|| |
| … | … | … |
| 35 | 39 | Drosten hatte Test erst fertig, nachdem ein Unternehmen ein komerzielles Produkt veröffentlicht |
| 36 | 40 | weiter: https://newsblog.one/was-olfert-landt-vom-pcr-test-haelt/ |
| 37 | 41 | |
| 42 | ||
| 43 | ====**Was the test designed to produce cases?**==== | |
| 44 | * Indiz: schnelle Entwicklungszeit? | |
| 45 | * Indiz: ((https://www.sott.net/article/437207-COVID19-PCR-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with)) | |
| 46 | ||
| 47 | ====**Did the approvers/regalatory institutions know?**==== | |
| 48 | * double checked with different test method if SARS-Cov-2? | |
| 49 | * ? <[// "I just want to identify who sponsored that simulation conference, 6 weeks before the first news broke out of Wuhan,â I interjected. âIt was the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security, and the World Economic Forum. Incidentally, all the stats, projections and modeling you see in the media are coming out of Johns Hopkins.â"// https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ ?]> | |
| 50 | * Corman Drosten Test was promoted by authorities over other alternatives | |
| 51 | ||
| 52 | ||
| 53 | ||
| 38 | 54 | ---- |
| 39 | 55 | |
| 40 | 56 | ChariteÂŽ funding 550 Mio $ |
| 41 | 57 | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Summit |
| 58 | ||
| 59 | Easier to produce numbers with different regulations for SARS-Cov-2 compared with SARS-Cov-1 | |
| 60 | * accredition procedures changed | |
| 61 | * cibd approval > labs are not accountable, leaves black box | |
| 42 | 62 | |
| 43 | 63 | |
| 44 | 64 | Fauci E-Mails: |
| … | … | … |
| 47 | 67 | * https://archive.org/details/anthony-fauci-emails/mode/2up |
| 48 | 68 | |
| 49 | 69 | * https://youtu.be/bAICMQ1D5F8 Fauci on PCR Test |
| 70 | ||
| 71 |