Versionsunterschiede von Informationssammlung Corona / PCR-Test
| 42 | 42 | |
|---|---|---|
| 43 | 43 | ====**Was the test designed to produce cases?**==== |
| 44 | 44 | * Indiz: schnelle Entwicklungszeit? |
| 45 |
* |
|
| 45 | * Indiz: ((https://www.sott.net/article/437207-COVID19-PCR-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with)) | |
| 46 | 46 | |
| 47 | 47 | ====**Did the approvers/regalatory institutions know?**==== |
| 48 | 48 | * double checked with different test method if SARS-Cov-2? |
| 49 | 49 | * ? <[// "I just want to identify who sponsored that simulation conference, 6 weeks before the first news broke out of Wuhan,â I interjected. âIt was the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security, and the World Economic Forum. Incidentally, all the stats, projections and modeling you see in the media are coming out of Johns Hopkins.â"// https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ ?]> |
| 50 | * Corman Drosten Test was promoted by authorities over other alternatives | |
| 50 | 51 | |
| 51 |
|
|
| 52 |
|
|
| 53 | 52 | |
| 54 | 53 | |
| 55 | 54 | ---- |
| 56 | 55 | |
| 57 | 56 | ChariteÂŽ funding 550 Mio $ |
| 58 | 57 | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Summit |
| 58 | ||
| 59 | Easier to produce numbers with different regulations for SARS-Cov-2 compared with SARS-Cov-1 | |
| 60 | * accredition procedures changed | |
| 61 | * cibd approval > labs are not accountable, leaves black box | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 63 | |
| 61 | 64 | Fauci E-Mails: |
| … | … | … |
| 64 | 67 | * https://archive.org/details/anthony-fauci-emails/mode/2up |
| 65 | 68 | |
| 66 | 69 | * https://youtu.be/bAICMQ1D5F8 Fauci on PCR Test |
| 70 | ||
| 71 |